top of page
dinalynch9567

Unveiling the Shadows: Legal Loopholes and Mind Games Exposed

Because of you Part 10:

Dear Barbara,

To recap I sent you an email on 3/2/22 about your clients nuisances that interrupted my sleep and that I needed 8 hours of sleep because I am physically disabled yet working 7 days a week.


Yet you had an audacity of filing court motions without answering the plaintiffs’ complaints. It should have been a “default “ because you, the defendants’ attorney did not answer the plaintiffs’ complaints.


For the purpose of the public, see California Code Procedure §§ 585-587.5

After you dragged us with your court motions, you had the audacity to serve me your special mandatory questions with the threat to be sanctioned even if my name is not listed as a plaintiff. It was only my husband’s name listed as a plaintiff in first amended complaint.


This series is a continuation of your mandatory questions that is not humane:

Interrogatory question 44 to 46- you ask for the facts,documents that my husband and I shower in our own property and for us to identify all those individuals that has the knowledge that we shower in our own property.

These questions are not only “intimidating “ but also a means to “body shame me and my husband.”

I don’t shower with my clothes on!  With the exception of my facial skin, everything in me is physically ugly!


You asked for a documentation of us showering and the only way to do that is to give you a picture.

What did you do to my “husband’s naked picture showering?”


I didn’t submit a picture of my “naked body showering “ but I can assure you that after my death, I will be showing it to you and your subordinates and director that participated in manipulating us.


You not only cause us “needless expenses “ but also you made my husband give up! My husband was mentally force to settle after his naked picture showering was submitted to our attorney to give to you!


Your legal tactics and mental manipulation as an attorney not only violated your “Rules of Professional Conduct” but also violated your company’s nonprofit organization mission.


For the purpose of the public, it is the legal aid for the elderly and disabled nonprofit organization that declared the wealthy 41 year old man and 61 year old man “poor” thus waiving their court fees.

This is the organization that Barbara is employed who dragged and mentally manipulated an elderly plaintiff and his disabled wife!

There’s more to come!

1 view0 comments

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page